Commonwealth v. Ramirez

Lu, John T., J.

INTRODUCTION

The defendant, Edwin Ramirez (Ramirez), moves to suppress statements, observations, and physical evidence seized on March 22, 2006, from Ramirez and from the property at 73 Boutelle Street in Fitchburg; and evidence, statements or observations from telephone calls on March 22 and 23, 2006, to a cell phone seized from Ramirez on March 22, 2006.

Ramirez moves to suppress because he claims the search warrant fails to satisfy the particularity requirement; the search warrant application failed to establish a sufficient nexus between drug dealing and Ramirez’s apartment…