Legal Opinion

Fenton v. Sinclair Refining Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 23, 1955No. 36289PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

This action was commenced by William Fenton as administrator of the estate of Noble T. Rush, deceased, to recover damages on behalf of said decedent’s widow and minor children on account of said decedent’s wrongful, instant death in an airplane accident. The defendant named in the action is Sinclair Refining Company, owner of the airplane and, in the administrator plaintiff’s petition, the cause of action for the damages is predicated on said company’s negligence in failing to keep the airplane in proper repair.

The accident and death occurred, near Ohio as revealed in…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchendelSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Mecom v. Fitzsimmons Drilling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. City of Shawnee v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. City of Louisville v. Hart's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  5. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Goode, Adm'x.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. District Court of Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  2. Fenton v. Sinclair Refining CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API