Legal Opinion
Arab v. Blinken
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 21, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2021-1852Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MOHAMED ARAB, Plaintiff, v. ANTONY BLINKEN, in his official capacity Civil Action No. 21-1852 (BAH) as Secretary of State, et al., Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Mohamed Arab, a U.S. citizen, seeks to compel defendants—various federal officials in their official capacities—to adjudicate his wife’s visa application, which has been pending without decision for over two years. Compl. ¶¶ 1, 14, ECF No. 1. Plaintiff claims defendants have unreasonably delayed the visa application, in violation of the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.