Legal Opinion

People v. Rotenberg

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 26, 1996No. 95SA413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel have entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct. C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation that the respondent be publicly censured. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1975. The conditional admission states that on June 4, 1993, the respondent’s client came to his home/office to speak with him. The respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. FahseltSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  2. People v. DoolittleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. People v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. MyersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. People v. CoulterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API