Legal Opinion

City of Dayton, Ohio v. City Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1926No. 4630PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a final decree enjoining the enforcement of a Dayton city ordinance, which, in effect, prohibited the use by the street railways of the so-called “one-man” cars. Pursuant to city ordinances, which by their acceptance had, under the Ohio rule, become contracts (Columbus Co. v. Columbus, 249 U. Si 399, 39 S. Ct. 349, 63 L. Ed. 669, 6 A. L. R. 1648), the street railways in Dayton had for many years provided, upon each car, a conductor and a motorman. About April, 1921, in an effort to lessen the then greatly increased cost of operation, there had…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  5. Greene v. Louisville & Interurban RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lloyds of Texas v. BobbittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Texas Electric Service Co. v. City of SeymourDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1931
  3. Central Kentucky Natural Gas Co. v. City of Mt. SterlingDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1928
  4. Georgia Power Co. v. Borough of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1931
  5. Illinois Cent. R. v. City of MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API