Legal Opinion

Town of Hobart v. Collier

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1958PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, C. J.

The town of Hobart is a municipality contiguous with the city of Green Bay on the west. On February 5, 1952, the town board adopted an ordinance creating a residential zone in part of the town; the balance was not zoned. On April 15, 1952, the ordinance was amended to extend the residential zone to include the entire town area.

In the preamble of the ordinance as amended its purpose is declared to be the regulation and restriction of the size of buildings and yards, their location and use for trade, industry, residence, or other purposes, the creation of districts for such purposes and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. State ex rel. Tingley v. GurdaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. State ex rel. Ford Hopkins Co. v. Mayor of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Rowland v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  5. City of La Crosse v. ElbertsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Glenbrook Road Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning AdjustmentDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Buhler v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State ex rel. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. WahnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Ex Rel. American Oil Co. v. BessentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API