People v. Wilson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
The trial court did not err in giving the missing witness charge. Although defendant had no burden to come forward with alibi evidence, once he did so, his failure to call an available witness to support the alibi could be brought to the jury’s attention inasmuch as it appeared that the witness, defendant’s wife, would be favorable to him and hostile to the prosecution and the testimony would not be trivial or cumulative (see People v Rodriquez, 38 NY2d 95).
Defendant’s assertion that the charge violated his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. DaghitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- People v. MelskiNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. DickersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
3Cited by37 opinions
- People v. ChippNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. SavinonNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- People v. MacAnaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. HannukselaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.