Legal Opinion

McIntire v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 7, 1990No. C6-89-2265Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Marcie Mclntire seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for alleged violations of her civil rights and liberties and for various state law claims arising from discharge from her employment with the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Three of the defendants, all government officials, unsuccessfully moved for summary judgment claiming a qualified immunity from liability on the free speech allegations. On appeal from the denial of their motion we reversed and remanded, directing the trial court to reconsider its decision in light of Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 102 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API