Legal Opinion
Weldon v. Howard
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 20, 1932No. 22092PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.
1. It appearing in this case that the testimony objected to by the plaintiff was not injurious or prejudicial to her, it was harmless error to admit it, and a new trial should not be granted on this ground. Lindsey v. Lindsey, 14 Ga. 657; Williams v. Hamilton, 30 Ga. 968; Thompson v. Thompson, 77 Ga. 692 (3 S. E. 261) ; Mayor &c. of Gainesville v. Caldwell, 81 Ga. 76 (7 S. E. 99) ; Hollingsworth v. Howard, 113 Ga. 1099 (31 S. E. 465) ; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Thornton, 119 Ga. 455 (46 S. E. 678) ; McGriff v. McGriff, 154 Ga. 560 (115 S. E. 21).
2. It was not error for the court to permit the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Exchange Bank v. LohSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Lindsey v. LindseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
- McGriff v. McGriffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pembrook Management, Inc. v. CossaboonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Fields v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Dismuke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Fieldcrest Mills, Inc. v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977