Legal Opinion

Stevenson v. Woodward

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1906No. Civ. No. 244PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. . Frank F. Oster, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment for plaintiffs. Appeal by defendant Casner from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.

Appellant Casner was the owner of a warehouse in San Bernardino. He leased floor space therein to one Woodward, then engaged in the ice business, and Woodward employed plaintiffs to construct an ice-room ten by sixteen by eight feet in dimensions in said space so leased, with the knowl edge and consent of Casner. Plaintiffs furnished materials and did the work in the construction of such ice-room, and regularly filed their notice of lien. No notice was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bianchi v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Star Mill and Lumber Co. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  2. Reno Electrical Works, Inc. v. WardNevada Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Mahnke v. Marken Acres Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  4. Shelley v. KofkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API