Legal Opinion

Gallagher v. BNSF Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 8, 2013No. A12-1327PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLEARY, Judge.

Appellant Sean Gallagher sustained personal injuries while coupling railroad cars for his employer, respondent BNSF Railway Company. He commenced this action, alleging that his injuries resulted from respondent’s violation of the Safety Appliance Act (SAA) and negligence under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA). The district court granted summary judgment for respondent, and appellant challenges that decision, asserting that genuine issues of material fact exist as to both claims. We reverse and remand.

*88FACTS

This case involves the mechanisms used to couple…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gregory Monson v. Jeff SuckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  2. Kinworthy v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Eischen v. Crystal Valley CooperativeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
  4. Bisnott v. Norfolk Southern RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  5. Bisnott v. Norfolk Southern RailwayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API