Legal Opinion

Frye v. American Painting Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1994No. 41A01-9405-CV-161PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Judge.

Harold Frye, II, appeals the adverse summary judgment entered in his lawsuit against the American Painting Company [American] alleging that American negligently hired and/or retained an employee, Robert Hicks, who burglarized, stole property from, and set fire to, Frye's home after business hours. Frye raises two issues, but because one requires that we reverse, we address it only. Restated, it is:

Whether there is a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether American negligently supervised or retained Hicks in its employment?

FACTS

The facts in the light most…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Caylor-Nickel Clinic, P.C.Indiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Tallahassee Furniture Co., Inc. v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  3. Coath v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Harper v. Guarantee Auto StoresIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. McKinney v. Public Service Co. of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Board of Trustees of Hamilton Southeastern School Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  2. INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Rebecca Zander v. Samuel Orlich, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  4. Erie Insurance v. American Painting Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Doe v. ATC, INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API