Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Kjersgaard
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1980No. 792PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOWLING, Judge:
Defendant’s principle exception to the judgment of sentence imposed following his conviction of rape1 and corruption of minors2 is the propriety of admitting evidence of a prior offense.
“It is black letter law that evidence of one crime is inadmissible against a defendant being tried for another crime because the fact of the commission of one offense is not proof of the commission of another. See, Commonwealth v. Foose, 441 Pa. 173, 272 A.2d 452 (1971). However, there sometimes exist special circumstances which operate as exceptions to the general rule and bring the case within…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WableSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. KlochSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. UlatoskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. BouldenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. RossSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. SitlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- State v. WinklerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.