Bretch v. White
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
The question for our determination is whether notes and a real estate mortgage, signed by mark but not in compliance with the statutory requirements, áre validated by the acknowledgment on the mortgage, regular in form, and by proof that such mark was in fact made and the money received by the mortgagors.
There is no dispute about the facts. Sallie M. White and Maud H. White, her daughter, borrowed $3,500 from Sam Bretch and executed a series of notes and a mortgage as security. He paid the money pursuant to their instructions, most of it going to a creditor of Maud White. The name of Sallie…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oklahoma City Development Co. v. PicardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Likowski v. CatlettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Rennie v. Oklahoma Farm Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Henry v. Union Sawmill CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- United States v. BlackCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rodgers v. Tecumseh BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Jackson v. Central Commercial Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947