Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. McAuliffe

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 31, 1960No. 19043PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Sutton

Wiggins, after receiving a summons to appear in the traffic division of the Municipal Court in the City and County of Denver, filed a complaint in the district court for relief in the nature of a writ of prohibition under Rule 106 (a) (4), R.C.P. Colo. In the complaint it was alleged that the municipal court lacked jurisdiction in the matter, substantially for the following reasons:

1. The summons and complaint was defective in a material and substantive form required by law, in that it did not specify the date of passage by the City Council of the ordinance allegedly violated by Wiggins; and,

2…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. State v. LingmanUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Scott v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  4. City and County of Denver v. PikeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. McIntosh v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DeLong v. CITY AND CTY. OF DENVERSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. People v. HizhniakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API