Legal Opinion

Scott v. City and County of Denver

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 14, 1952No. 16604PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

On March 27, 1950, in a document dignified by the label, “Summons” and “Complaint,” plaintiff in error, herein referred to as defendant, was ordered to be in the municipal court on “2-13, 1950 to answer charge of D1C-55-56-57-52A-10A which occurred at 8th Ave. & Kalamath Date 2-4-50 1 16 A. M.” Whatever this may be, so far as any record of the police court discloses, is left to conjecture. One guess is as good as another.

The comedy of the entire matter soon develops. Defendant appeared as per schedule, and to establish that he did not do all of these “numbers,” he pleaded “not guilty.”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sronce v. DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  2. Sronce v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. City of Canon City v. MerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Holly Development, Inc. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Dooley v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  4. Jackson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  5. Light v. RogersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API