Legal Opinion

Browning v. Corbett

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 20, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5776PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Judge.

Appellant Richard Browning appeals from the trial court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of appellees and the dismissal of his complaint, filed as a class action, which sought an injunction and an accounting. He contends that A.R.S. § 25-311.01(E) is unconstitutional. This subsection requires both the petitioner and respondent in a marriage dissolution action to pay, in addition to the court filing fees, a $12.00 fee which is distributed between the domestic violence shelter fund and the child abuse prevention and treatment fund. We hold that the statute is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schweiker v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Safety Net for Abused Persons v. SeguraSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Gange v. Clerk of Burleigh County District CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Fund Manager v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  4. Thiele v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  5. Fent v. State ex rel. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API