MacKey v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBessey, P. J.
This conviction rests entirely upon extrajudicial statements made by the plaintiff in error, here referred to as the defendant, while under arrest in the office of the county attorney of Muskogee county, as testified to by a witness H. L. Watts, a deputy sheriff. This witness stated that after he had arrested the defendant, he took him to the office of the county attorney, where he was interrogated. Following some preliminary questions, the record discloses the following:
“By the County Attorney: Q. What whisky were we talking about, Mr. Watts? A. The whisky that was gotten at 623 South Third…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ellis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Vaughan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ellington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
- Barefield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928
3Cited by9 opinions
- Langley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
- Gossett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Saunders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- Basham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.