Legal Opinion

Sakezzie v. Utah Indian Affairs Commission

District Court, D. Utah

Decided August 25, 1961No. C-55-61PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

This case was tried to the Court without a jury on May 31 and June 1 and 2, 1961. Plaintiffs appeared in person and by their attorney Milton A. Oman. Defendants appeared by Ronald N. Boyce, Assistant Attorney General for the State of Utah. The case having been submitted for decision and the Court having announced in open court its tentative views, and now being fully advised, the Court now makes and enters the following

Findings of Fact.

1. The plaintiffs are residents and citizens of the State of Utah, residing on the “Aneth Extension” of the Navajo Indian…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pelt v. UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. JimSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Pelt v. State of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. Sakezzie v. Utah State Indian Affairs CommissionDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1963
  5. State of Utah v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API