In re the Detention of W.C.C.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 W.C.C. argues the probable cause hearing for his civil commitment under Washington’s invol*262untary treatment act (ITA), chapter 71.05 RCW, should have been dismissed as untimely. At issue is whether weekends and holidays are excluded from calculating the maximum time period allowed for continuances under RCW 71.05.240(1).
¶2 We reject W.C.C.’s argument and agree with the Court of Appeals. Weekends and holidays are excluded when computing the maximum time allowed for continuances under RCW 71.05.240(1).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶3 At the time of his involuntary civil commitment, W.C.C. lived…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GreshamWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CostichWashington Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re The Detention Of: M.l.h., IvCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington, V. L.h.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2021