Federal Trade Commission v. Noland, Jr.

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Federal Trade Commission, No. CV-20-00047-PHX-DWL 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 James D. Noland, Jr., et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court are Plaintiff Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) motion 16 to compel (Doc. 322) and Defendants Jay Noland, Lina Noland, Scott Harris, and Thomas 17 Sacca’s (together, “the Individual Defendants”) motion for a protective order (Doc. 344). 18 For the following reasons, the motion to compel is granted in modified form and the motion 19 for a protective order…