Legal Opinion

Clark v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 11, 2001No. A01A0223PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Convicted of rape and burglary with intent to rape, Tim Clark appeals on the general grounds. He argues that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions because the State adduced no physical evidence of any struggle, fight, or force, so the trial court should have granted his motion for new trial. No court except the trial court is vested by OCGA §§ 5-5-20 and 5-5-21 with the authority to grant a new trial in a matter relating to the weight of the evidence. Since the victim testified that Clark entered her residence without consent and then forcibly raped her, we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Humphrey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  3. Perryman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  4. Littleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duran v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  2. Flowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  3. Brewster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Madison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  5. Stepho v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API