Legal Opinion
Riley v. Fenty
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 12, 2010No. 09-CV-812PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OBERLY, Associate Judge:
Under the District of Columbia’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), D.C.Code § 2-531 et seq. (2001), married appellants Richard Condit and Clame Riley requested all Department of Youth Rehabilitation Services (DYRS) records “that pertain to” themselves and their five children. Appellants also requested disclosure of DYRS staff and administrative manuals, statements of policy, and interpretations of policy, acts, regulations and rules relating, in broad terms, to matters involving committed youth. DYRS concluded that the personal records were statutorily exempt from…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Robert G. Vaughn v. Bernard Rosen, Executive Director, United States Civil Service CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Larson v. Department of StateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Karl Gallant v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Joseph Alan Lykins v. United States Department of Justice and Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
- McCray v. McGeeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fraternal Order of Police v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Fraternal Order of Police, Metropolitan Labor Committee v. District of ColumbiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Fraternal Order of Police, Metropolitan Police Labor Committee v. The District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Padou v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- KIRBY VINING v. COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIADistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.