Legal Opinion

Alho v. Sterling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1963No. 38,778PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Plaintiff sues to rescind a contract conveying to defendant 40 acres of property located in St. Louis County, alleging the conveyance was induced by “undue influence, chicanery and fraud.” Before answering, defendant moved for dismissal under Rule 12.02, Rules of Civil Procedure, or in the alternative under Rule 12.06. In the event these motions were denied, defendant sought an order compelling the plaintiff to allege fraud with more particularity and certainty under Rule 9.02. The court denied the motions to dismiss but, without indicating the consequences of his refusal to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  2. Parrish v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. Lovering v. Webb Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Baer v. Waseca Milling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Verry v. MurphyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. O'BRIEN v. KemperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. Stubblefield v. GruenbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Seafirst Commercial Corp. v. SpeakmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API