Legal Opinion

Hoberg v. Smith

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided May 26, 2005No. CI-00-04599Published

1Opinion of the Court

CULLEN, J,

In his motion for summary judgment, defendant, Brian W. Smith, seeks dismissal of this action on the ground that plaintiff, Paula Hoberg, failed to make a prompt, good faith effort to effectuate service so that her claim is barred by the statute of limitations.

*538Based on the record before it and the arguments of counsel, the court concludes that defendant’s position is correct. Accordingly, Ms motion for summary judgment will be granted.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

On May 9, 1998, plaintiff sustained personal injuries as a result of a collision at the intersection of Plum and Ross…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ertel v. Patriot-News Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Lamp v. HeymanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Phaff v. GernerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Pennsylvania State University v. County of CentreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Farinacci v. Beaver County Industrial Development AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API