Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 1988No. 54116PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.

Movant Walter Russell appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant pled guilty to second degree murder pursuant to a plea agreement. Movant was sentenced to forty years imprisonment to be served concurrently with the sentence imposed in a separate cause on an assault charge. On appeal movant argues that the motion court erred in denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing in that his allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel were sufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

Initially we note…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Deaton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Hurd v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shaw v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Yount v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Simmonsen v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API