Pendarvis v. United States
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, under Rule- 56 of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, in the captioned matter was heard during the March, 1965 term of court in Columbia. The court has carefully considered the record, including interrogatories propounded by defendant, answers thereto by plaintiff, and able arguments of counsel.
The action is brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1346 [b], Federal Tort Claims Act. Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that, on August 6,1963, at eleven o’clock p. m, plaintiff was negligently seized and injured in the front yard of his home in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States of America v. Cyril T. Faneca, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Stepp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
- Anthony Moos v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Nichols v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1964
- Lane v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ricca v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Gale v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1980
- Bouvy v. Analog Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2020
- Evans Hotels, LLC, et al. v. Unite Here! Local 30, et al.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.