Gale v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAWKINS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. The United States has taken the position that this court has no subject matter jurisdiction over, the plaintiffs’ claims because they are barred by 28 U.S.C. § 2680(h). That statutory provision precludes recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act for “any claim arising out of assault [or] battery.” Further, the defendant argues that the complaints fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the government has no duty to control its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arnold Panella v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
- Frank J. Underwood, as Administrator of the Estate of Shirley Underwood Dunn, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Edwin M. Gaudet v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Stepp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Liuzzo v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Mulloy v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1995
- Taylor v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Gale v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1981
- Spaulding v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1985