Legal Opinion

State of Texas v. Schuenemann

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Guadalupe. Tried below before Hon. M. Kerror.

1Opinion of the Court

NEILL, Associate Justice.

This suit was instituted by the county attorney in the name of the State of Texas, for the use and benefit of the county of Guadalupe, against Charles Schuenemann, as principal, and the sureties on his bond as a liquor dealer, to recover $500 as a penalty for an alleged infraction of said bond. The breach of the bond alleged was that Schuenemann permitted a minor to enter and remain in his house and place of business where spirituous, vinous, malt liquors, and medicated bitters capable of producing intoxication were kept for sale and sold in quantities of one gallon…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schreiber v. SharplessSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. United States v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Stokes v. . StickneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. County of San Luis Obispo v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Jones' Adm'r v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. RollsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Miller Management Co. v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Whorton v. NevittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. United States v. JolesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1917
  5. State v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API