Legal Opinion
Jones v. Izzo
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 25, 1958No. File 101421PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFitzGerald, J.
The trial of the within ease to a jury at Danbury occupied three days. At the conclusion of the plaintiff’s case in chief, the three defendants moved that the plaintiff be nonsuited on the ground that he had not made out a prima facie case. The motion was granted as to the defendant Fred Izzo, the minor son of the other two defendants, and denied as to the latter defendants. At the conclusion of all of the evidence, the remaining defendants moved for a directed verdict in their favor. The motion was denied.
At 3:45 p.m. on January 10, following a charge that occupied one hour in delivery, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. StoutSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Herman v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Ahern v. Livermore Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Lang v. HedrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Wood v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frances Metzger Wirth Stephan, Guardian of the Estate of Charles Wirth v. The Marlin Firearms Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965