Legal Opinion

Honolulu Ltd. v. Cain

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 8, 1966No. [No. 245, September Term, 1966.]Published

1Opinion of the Court

244 Md. 590 (1966)

224 A.2d 433

HONOLULU LIMITED

v.

CAIN, ET VIR

[No. 245, September Term, 1966.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 8, 1966.

The cause was argued on 10/11/66 before HAMMOND, C.J., and MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ., and reargued on 11/7/66 before HAMMOND, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER, BARNES, McWILLIAMS and FINAN, JJ.

Phillips L. Goldsborough, III, (on both arguments), with whom were Robert E. Cadigan and Smith, Somerville & Case on the brief, for appellant.

Richard A. Reid (on both arguments), with whom were John E. Ensor and Royston, Mueller,…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Rose v. Melody LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Smith v. BernfeldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  3. Rawls v. Hochschild, Kohn & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
  4. Moulden v. Greenbelt Consumer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  5. Fitzsimons v. National Tea Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API