Legal Opinion

Rollins v. Atlantic City Railroad

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 13, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On rule to show cause why verdict should not be set aside and new trial granted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reed, J.

This is an action brought by the plaintiffs, as heirs-at-law of Daniel Rollins, against the Atlantic City Railroad Company, to recover damages for the loss of timber claimed to have been burned through the negligent conduct of the defendant’s servants.

The first reason assigned upon the argument was that the. plaintiffs failed to show title to the property injured.

There was no proof of actual possession by the plaintiffs, but they relied upon a title derived from the proprietors. This title was regularly traced to Charles Schumacher, George…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carver v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Deery v. CraySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Fulkerson v. HolmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. McKinnon v. . BlissNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Garwood v. DennisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1811

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Homewood Realty Corp. v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1931
  2. May v. Illinois Central RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Neustadt v. Coline Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Fielder v. PembertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Johnson v. CarlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API