Simmons v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The subject matter of the motion is fully set forth in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
Campbell, Ohief Justice,
delivered the opinion of the court:
Frederick A. Fenning, Esq., has been for some years an attorney at law, duly admitted to practice in the Court of Claims. During the war with Germany he became an officer and discharged duties as such in the office of the Judge Advocate General of the Army. These duties having terminated, there was issued to him a commission as lieutenant colonel in the Reserve Corps of the United States Army, inactive status.
Mr. Fenning desires to prosecute the claim of plaintiff in the annexed stated case and moves the court for an order authorizing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ex Parte CurtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- United States v. MouatSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Tyler v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Reservists Committee to Stop War v. LairdDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1971
- United States v. LaneUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004