Legal Opinion

United States v. Action Security, Inc.

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided January 10, 2024No. 3:19-cv-00134Unknown

1Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA 3 4 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 5 Plaintiff, 6 v. Case No. 3:19-cv-00134-HRH-KFR 7 8 ACTION SECURITY, INC., and SCOTT HENKE,1 9 10 Defendants. 11 12 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 The Court recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions to Dissolve 14 Defendant Action Security, Inc. be GRANTED. The Court finds that Defendants have 15 repeatedly violated the orders of the District Court, have consistently engaged in 16 actions designed to frustrate the execution and intent of the District Cou rt’s orders, 17 and have willfully…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  4. International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API