Legal Opinion
Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Rose
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 8, 1943No. 11554Published
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This statement of the nature and result of the suit, conceded to be substantially correct as such, is made by appellant:
“This is a workmen’s compensation case. B. F. Rose is the injured employee. Texas Employers’ Insurance Association is the carrier for James L. White individually, and Anchor Casualty Company is the insurer for W. E. White individually. Rose sued both carriers, alleging in the alternative that he was an employee of one or the other of the Whites, or both, and the insurers alleged that Rose was thé employee of a partnership composed of the two Whites.
“A trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Security Union Ins. Co. v. McLeodTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HarringtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Traders' & General Ins. Co. v. EmmertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. AddisonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.