Legal Opinion

Lenoir v. Tannehill

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided July 18, 1986No. Civ. A. S85-0953(NG)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GEX, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Richard C. Lenoir, has brought a Rule 12 Motion to dismiss a counterclaim asserted by Defendants, Robert W. Tannehill and Creative Controllers, Incorporated, in the above styled action.

The facts significant to the disposition of this Motion are quite simple. Richard Lenoir filed a Complaint against Tannehill and Creative Controllers, Inc., alleging breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, and fraud. In response to Lenoir’s Complaint, Defendants filed a Counterclaim. Count One of Defendants’ Counterclaim alleges that Plaintiff’s suit is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  2. Vardaman S. Dunn v. Koehring Company, Hyde Construction Company, Inc., Cross v. Koehring Company, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. Hyde Construction Co., Inc. v. Koehring CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1974
  4. Valley Dry Goods Co. v. BufordMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chalk v. BertholfCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2007
  2. Mitchell v. Random House, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1988
  3. In Matter of Interdiction of ThomsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Ingram v. HorneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Zurich American Ins. Co. v. QUEEN'S MACHINERY CO., LTD.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API