Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Steinberg & Steinberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 23, 1971PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEager, J.

The appellants seek arbitration with their other partners of controversies involving limited partnerships to which they are parties, and for recovery of damages for breaches *58of certain partnership agreements. Here, however, the demand for arbitration as served by the appellants fails to specify the claimed arbitrable disputes with reasonable certainty and also embraces nonarbitrable matters.

The demand for arbitration states that the appellants seek “a determination of the value of the partnership interests” of the respondents in the several partnerships and a direction that, on payment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration between Amphenol Corp. & MicrolabNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. In re the Arbitration between Bercu & LevinsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  3. In Re the Arbitration Between Bercu & LevinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. In re the Arbitration between Unipak Aviation Corp. & MantellNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board of Education of Newfane Central School District No. 1 v. Newfane Teachers Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. Paragon Resources, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API