Legal Opinion
Aurelio Duran Gonzalez v. U.S. Department of Homeland Se
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 29, 2013No. 09-35174PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Opinion by Judge SILVERMAN; Dissent by Judge CALLAHAN.
ORDER
The opinion filed on October 25, 2011, 659 F.3d 930, is withdrawn. A superseding opinion and dissent will be filed concurrently with this order. The Petition for Rehearing En Banc filed on December 9, 2011 is denied as moot.
OPINION
SILVERMAN, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-Appellants are Aurelio Duran Gonzales and six other Mexican citizens. Each of these aliens was previously deported or removed and then subsequently reentered the United States without inspection. From within the United States, these individuals applied for an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- National Cable & Telecommunications Assn. v. Brand X Internet ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Gardner v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Gonzales v. Department of Homeland SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alejandro Rodriguez v. Timothy RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Flo & Eddie, Inc. v. Pandora Media, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Juan Gomez-Garcia v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013