Legal Opinion

ROSADO v. DUGAN

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2022No. 2:19-cv-05068Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR., Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 19-5068 MICHAEL P. DUGAN, et al., Defendants. PAPPERT, J. January 11, 2022 MEMORANDUM Pro se Plaintiff Geronimo Rosado Jr. has challenged the Court in this civil rights case with a number of filings that are often confusing, disorganized and difficult to understand. His initial complaint was dismissed without prejudice because it did not comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. In allowing amendment, the Court provided guidance on how Rosado could correct…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API