Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 1972No. 45723PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORRISON, Judge.

This is a bond forfeiture proceeding.

Appellants’ contention that the final judgment does not dispose of all of the parties on the bond must be sustained.

The judgment nisi granted judgment against the principal and both Richard Hodges, Jr., and Claudia A. Rivers, sureties. The final judgment makes no mention of Claudia A. Rivers.

Joe’s Bonding Co. et al. v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 145 is authority for the rule found in 8 Tex.Jur.2d, Bail and Recognizance, Sec. 87, Page 212, as follows :

“A final judgment must be rendered as to the sureties and the principal. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Joe's Bonding Company v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Murray v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1992
  2. Lozano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1998
  3. Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Octavio Castaneda, Individually D/B/A O. Castaneda Bail Bonds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008
  5. Octavio Castaneda, Individually D/B/A O. Castaneda Bail Bonds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API