Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Mark v. Keller

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 20, 1933No. 29,007PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Certiorari to the industrial commission to review an award of increased compensation, a former award having been set aside and a rehearing granted.

April 5, 1926, Charles Mark, the employe-respondent, suffered occupational injury and was awarded, in addition to his expense of hospitalization and treatment, a compensation payable weekly. Thereafter, October 16, 1926, the insurer-relator filed notice of its intention to discontinue payments as of September 26, 1926. The employe filed his objections, and the issue so made came on for hearing December 15, 1926.

The referee awarded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Glassman v. RadtkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Tolversen v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Elsenpeter v. PotvinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. Radzak v. Mercy HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. Hawkinson v. MirauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  4. Batchelder v. Northwestern Hanna Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  5. Jovanovich v. St. Paul Corrugating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API