Legal Opinion
SMITH v. BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL CORPORATION
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided February 27, 2020No. 1:20-cv-00267Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CASSANDRA SMITH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:20-cv-00267-JPH-DLP ) BARTHOLOMEW CONSOLIDATED ) SCHOOL CORPORATION, ) MOUNT HEALTHY SCHOOL, ) TERESA HEINY, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER I. Granting in forma pauperis status Plaintiff Cassandra Smith’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. [2], is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). While in forma pauperis status allows Ms. Smith to proceed without prepaying the filing fee, she remains liable for the full fees. Ross v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago,
748 F. App’x…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- Cesal v. MoatsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Brewster McCauley v. City of ChicagCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.