Aluminum Co. of America v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
Under the law as it stood in 1917, affiliated corporations were required to file consolidated returns for excess-profits taxes and separate returns for income taxes. In consonance with the law, Aluminum Company of America and its twenty-seven affiliated corporations made returns of both kinds for that year. During the year various units of this group of corporations had inter-company transactions of sale and purchase of commodities in which, pursuant to a recognized business policy of the group, profits were allowed and made. They were excluded from the consolidated…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Handy & Harman v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Atlantic City Electric Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jewell Grain Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Renick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Remco S. S. Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936