Legal Opinion

Aluminum Co. of America v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 29, 1933No. 5105PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Under the law as it stood in 1917, affiliated corporations were required to file consolidated returns for excess-profits taxes and separate returns for income taxes. In consonance with the law, Aluminum Company of America and its twenty-seven affiliated corporations made returns of both kinds for that year. During the year various units of this group of corporations had inter-company transactions of sale and purchase of commodities in which, pursuant to a recognized business policy of the group, profits were allowed and made. They were excluded from the consolidated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shwab v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. HethSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  3. Handy & Harman v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Burnet v. Aluminum Goods Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  5. Atlantic City Electric Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Board of Tax Commissioners v. Jewell Grain Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Renick v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  3. Remco S. S. Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API