Legal Opinion
State v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided December 20, 1972No. 55014PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RAWLINGS, Justice.
Trial jury found defendant, Dale Thomas Armstrong, guilty of obtaining money by false pretenses. He appeals from judgment entered thereon. We affirm.
The factual situation involved is substantially set forth in State v. Armstrong, 183 N.W.2d 205 (Iowa 1971) and need not be here repeated.
On this second appeal defendant asserts, as a sole ground for reversal, cumulative trial errors served, in effect, to unconstitutionally deny him a fair trial. In support thereof he calls into play U.S.Const., Amend. 14 and Iowa Const., art. I, § 9.
I. At the threshold it is apparent the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Moore v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- O’connor v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. BuchananSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Cedar Rapids Community School District v. ParrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. LamarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State v. BerchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
- State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.