Legal Opinion
Treadwell v. Truesdell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCann, J.:
The action was brought for the recovery of certain commissions alleged to be due the plaintiff from the defendant on the sale of the defendant’s real estate.
The plaintiff is a real estate broker in the city of Binghamton, N. Y., and the defendant, at the time the alleged cause of action *111arose, was a farmer residing near that city. Some two or three years before the time in question, according to the plaintiff’s version, the defendant had listed his farm for sale with the firm of which the plaintiff was then a member. It does not appear that the plaintiff had actively tried to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Lord v. United States Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Sampson v. OttingerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
- Southwick v. SwavienskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Newberry & Co. v. George W. Warnecke & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
- Companhia Geral De Comercio v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1968