Legal Opinion

Poole & Kent Co.

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 8, 1977No. 117-77PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

"Plaintiff brings this suit under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491, to recover the sum of $70,000 allegedly exacted by the Cost of Living Council as a penalty for increasing plaintiffs profit margin for custom services, contrary to the Economic Stabilization Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1904, and executive orders and regulations issued pursuant thereto. The $70,000 payment was offered and accepted in compromise on the basis of incorrect estimates of the financial results of uncompleted contracts, but results under these contracts show that no violation occurred, plaintiff says.
"The sole issue before us…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Buck Kreihs Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Metsch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lunday-Thagard Co. v. United States Department of the InteriorTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Tipperary Refining Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. United States Dept. of InteriorTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Wyoming Refining Co. v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API