Petersen v. Van Overbeke
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtGorman, J.
[¶ 1] Paul J. Van Overbeke appeals from a judgment of the District Court (Belfast, Worth, J. ) modifying his child support obligation to Katrina I. Petersen regarding their minor child. Van Overbeke argues that neither party requested that the court modify child support and that the court erred both by addressing the issue and in its calculations. Because the court had authority to modify child support but erred in its calculations, we vacate the judgment and remand for the court to enter a judgment that correctly calculates the parties' child support obligations.
I. BACKGROUND
[¶ 2] On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Efstathiou v. Aspinquid, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Ames v. AmesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- Hinkley v. HinkleySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Darcy L. Howard v. Patrick S. WhiteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2024
- Pamela A. Dobbins v. Mark J. DobbinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2020
- Patrick Bolduc v. Savannah (Bolduc) GetchiusSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2025