Legal Opinion · Dissent

Sleeper v. Sweetser

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 27, 1969No. 5-4999Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I respectfully dissent, because I think the court is departing from its previous position on summary judgments. I do not believe that the summary judgment procedure has been properly utilized in this case. This very wholesome process for eliminating claims and defenses without merit and thus expediting the disposition of litigation was not intended to be a vehicle for bypassing jury trials or for early prediction of the outcome of litigation, however obvious it might seem. We have always been very strict in resolving every doubt, against a summary judgment. See, e. g., Russell v. City of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  2. Engelhard Industries, Inc. v. Research Instrumental CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  3. Khalil Semaan v. L. Quincy Mumford, Librarian of CongressCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  4. Jerome L. Doff v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. Commercial Credit Plan, Inc. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API