Legal Opinion

Shaver v. Grendel Mills

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 27, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Before Memminger, J., Greenwood, October, 190-5. Action by Charlie Shaver, by guardian, against Grendel Mills on following complaint: COMPLAINT-. “The plaintiff above named, complaining of the defendant, alleges: “1. That the defendant ‘The Grendel Mills’ is, and at the times mentioned in this complaint, was, a corporation created by and under the laws o-f the State of South Carolina, with Jegal capacity to sue and be sued.

Read the full summary

Before Memminger, J., Greenwood, October, 190-5. Action by Charlie Shaver, by guardian, against Grendel Mills on following complaint: COMPLAINT-. “The plaintiff above named, complaining of the defendant, alleges: “1. That the defendant ‘The Grendel Mills’ is, and at the times mentioned in this complaint, was, a corporation created by and under the laws o-f the State of South Carolina, with Jegal capacity to sue and be sued. “2. That at the times hereinafter mentioned the defendant was engaged in business of manufacturing cotton cloths in its cotton mill at Greenwood, in the State o-f South…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered .by

Mr. Justice Gary.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to malee the complaint definite and certain.

The complaint, the notice of motion, the order refusing the motion, and the exceptions will be set out in the report of the case.

This Court is satisfied that the exceptions should be overruled for the reasons assigned by his Honor, the Circuit Judge, in the order refusing said motion.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the order of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
  2. Caldwell v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API