Legal Opinion

Stern v. Kennedy

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1962Published

1Opinion of the Court

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Froessel, Burke and Foster. Judges Fuld and Van Voorhis dissent and vote to reverse the order and to sustain the petition of appellant upon the ground that the evidence against him does not meet the standard prescribed (Matter of Di Nardo v. Monaghan, 282 App. Div. 5; Matter of Reger v. Mulrooney, 241 App. Div. 38, 44; People ex rel. Hussey v. Woods, 169 App. Div. 146, affd. 216 N. Y. 648; People ex rel. Kelly v. Waldo, 161 App. Div. 731, 732; cf. Matter of Evans v. Monaghan, 306 N. Y. 312, 319-320).

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Evans v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Di Nardo v. MonaghanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  3. People ex rel. Kelly v. WaldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  4. Reger v. MulrooneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. People ex rel. Hussey v. WoodsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API